This section reacts towards the concern ” just What maybe you have discovered?” Ergo, just representative outcomes from your quest ought to be presented. The outcome should really be necessary for conversation.
Statistical guidelines
- Indicate the analytical tests combined with all appropriate parameters: e.g., mean and standard deviation (SD): 44% (±3); median and interpercentile range: 7 years (4.5 to 9.5 years).
- Use mean and deviation that is standard report generally distributed information.
- Utilize median and interpercentile range to report skewed information.
- For figures, use two digits that are significant more accuracy is important (2.08, maybe maybe not 2.07856444).
- Never make use of percentages for really little examples e.g., “one away from two” really should not be changed by 50%.
But, keep in mind that many journals provide the chance of including materials that are supporting so make use of them easily for information of additional value. In this manner, never try to “hide” information when you look at the hope of saving it for the paper that is later. You may lose proof to bolster your summary. If data are way too numerous, you should use those supplementary materials.
Utilize sub-headings to help keep link between the exact same kind together, that will be better to review and read. Quantity these sub-sections for the ease of interior cross-referencing, but constantly taking into consideration the publisher’s Guide for Authors.
When it comes to data, choose a rational order that tells an obvious tale and helps it be and simple to know. Generally speaking, this will be within the exact same purchase as presented within the practices section.
A significant problem is you are presenting your results, so you cannot refer to others here that you must not include references in this section. If you make reference to other people, is basically because you’re speaking about your outcomes, and also this must certanly be within the Discussion area.divider|Because you may be talking about your outcomes, and this should be within the Discussion part.divider in the event that you make reference to others, is
Write the Discussion
Right Here you have to react to exactly exactly exactly what the outcomes suggest. Probably it’s the simplest part to publish, however the hardest area to obtain appropriate. The reason being it’s the many section that is important of article. right right Here you will get the chance to offer important computer data. Remember that a large amounts of manuscripts are refused since the Discussion is weak.
You’ll want to result in the Discussion corresponding towards the total results, but don’t reiterate the outcomes. Right right Here you’ll want paper writer to compare the posted outcomes by the colleagues with yours (using a few of the sources contained in the Introduction). Never ever ignore operate in disagreement with yours, in change, you need to confront it and persuade your reader you are proper or better.
Take into account the following tips:
1. Prevent statements that exceed just exactly what the outcomes can help.
2. Avoid unspecific expressions such as “higher temperature”, “at a lesser rate”, “highly significant”. Quantitative explanations are often preferred (35єC, 0.5%, p reduce individual communications, try not to consist of unpublished findings, manuscripts submitted although not yet accepted for book, magazines that aren’t peer evaluated, grey literature, or articles perhaps maybe not posted in English.
You will find the most authoritative information for each journal’s policy on citations when you consult the journal’s Guide for Authors as I have mentioned. Generally speaking, you ought to reduce communications that are personal and stay mindful on how you consist of unpublished findings. These will undoubtedly be required for some procedures, but start thinking about if they strengthen or weaken your paper. You may additionally start thinking about articles posted on research sites ahead of book, but give consideration to balancing these citations with citations of peer-reviewed research. When research that is citing languages apart from English, be familiar with the chance that not everybody when you look at the review procedure will talk the language of this cited paper and therefore it could be useful to look for a interpretation where feasible.
You should use any computer software, such as for example EndNote or Mendeley, to format you need to include your recommendations into the paper. Most journals have finally the chance to install little files with the format associated with the recommendations, letting you change it immediately. Additionally, Elsevier’s Your Paper your path system waves strict formatting needs for the original distribution of the manuscript provided that it has most of the crucial elements being presented right here.
Result in the guide list together with in-text citation conform strictly to your style offered into the Guide for Authors. Keep in mind that presentation associated with recommendations into the proper structure is the duty regarding the writer, maybe maybe perhaps not the editor. Checking the structure is generally a job that is large the editors. Make their work easier in addition they shall appreciate your time and effort.
Finally, always check the immediate following:
- Spelling of writer names
- 12 months of magazines
- Usages of “et al.”
- Punctuation
- Whether all recommendations are included
In my own next article, i shall offer strategies for composing the manuscript, authorship, and exactly how to publish a compelling resume cover letter. Stay tuned!divider
Recommendations and Acknowledgements
We have based this paper from the materials distributed to your attendees of several courses. It really is prompted by many people Guides for writers of Elsevier journals. A few of this info is additionally showcased in Elsevier’s Publishing Connect tutorials. In addition, We have consulted a few website pages: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/, www.physics.ohio-state.edu/
I would like to acknowledge Dr. Christiane Barranguet, Executive Publisher of Aquatic Sciences at Elsevier, on her constant help. And I also wish to thank Dr. Alison Bert, Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Connect; without her support, this show might have been impractical to finish.
Related Tales
In this series that is new “How to get ready a Manuscript for International Journals” — a practiced editor provides advice to improve your likelihood of acceptance
Students writes concerning the motivation behind their model for earthquake forecast – and just just what he discovered on their (“tedious but worth it”) journey to book
Whatever they don’t constantly inform you before you subscribe for graduate college
The perfect research system you envision is certainly not just what it’s
Journal editors expose the very best reasons a manuscript gets posted
Tips for Authors through the Publishing Connect Training Webcasts Channel
A log editor reveals the very best reasons numerous manuscripts don’t ensure it is to your review process that is peer