This might be description associated with the various kinds of paper at COLING 2018
you will need to find the paper that is right so that you can assist get high quality reviews for the work. Remember that all paper kinds utilize the exact same template; download the phrase and LaTeX templates here: coling2018.zip
Computationally-aided linguistic analysis
The main focus with this paper kind is brand brand brand new insight that is linguistic. It might take the form of an empirical research of some linguistic occurrence, or of the theoretical outcome of a linguistically-relevant formal system.
- Relevance: Is it paper highly relevant to COLING?
- Readability/clarity: Through the method the paper is created, is it possible to inform just exactly exactly what research concern had been addressed, the thing that was done and exactly why, and exactly how the outcomes relate solely to the study concern?
- Originality: How initial and revolutionary may be the extensive research described? Originality might be into the linguistic concern being addressed, into the methodology put on the linguistic concern, or in the mixture associated with the two.
- Technical correctness/soundness: may be the research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one able to trust the claims for the paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments and therefore are the results precisely interpreted?
- Reproducibility: can there be adequate information for some body in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcomes? n/a for many forms of theoretical results
- Data/code access: could be the data/code (as appropriate) available to the study community or perhaps is here a reason that is compelling why this isn’t feasible?
- Generalizability: Does the paper show exactly exactly how the outcomes generalize, either by deepening our comprehension of some linguistic system in basic or by showing methodology that may be put on other issues aswell? n/a for several forms of theoretical results
- Significant comparison: Does the paper clearly put the described utilize respect to current literary works? Can it be clear both what’s novel within the research presented and just how it develops on previous work?
- Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for the paper that is full-length or wouldn’t it reap the benefits of further development?
- General suggestion: there are lots of submissions that are good for slots at COLING 2018; essential could it be to feature that one? Will people discover great deal by looking over this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is much better to change from other reviewers rather than grade every thing in the centre.
NLP engineering test paper
This paper kind fits the majority of submissions at present CL and NLP is evolutionwriters legit seminars.
- Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
- Readability/clarity: Through the real means the paper is created, could you tell exactly exactly what research concern ended up being addressed, that which was done and exactly why, and exactly how the outcome relate solely to the study concern?
- Will it be clear what the authors’ hypothesis is? The facts? A text input reponse
- Could it be clear the way the writers have actually tested their theory? y/n
- Originality: How initial and revolutionary could be the research described? Observe that originality could include an innovative new method or a brand new task, or it might lie into the careful analysis of what the results are whenever a understood strategy is placed on a known task (in which the pairing is novel) or into the careful analysis of what the results are each time an understood strategy is placed on an understood task in a language that is new.
- Technical correctness/soundness: could be the research described in the paper technically sound and correct? Is one to trust the claims associated with paper—are they supported by the analysis or experiments and therefore are the results precisely interpreted?
- Will it be clear how a total results confirm/refute the theory, or will be the results inconclusive?
- Perform some writers explain the way the outcomes follow from their theory (rather than state, other possible confounding element)?
- Will be the datasets used obviously described and generally are they right for testing the theory as mentioned?
- Reproducibility: will there be detail that is sufficient somebody in the same industry to reproduce/replicate the outcomes?
- Data/code access: could be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the investigation community or perhaps is here a reason that is compelling why this is simply not feasible?
- Error analysis: Does the paper provide an error that is thoughtful, which searches for linguistic habits when you look at the kinds of mistakes created by the system(s) examined and sheds light on either avenues for future work or perhaps the way to obtain the strengths/weaknesses associated with systems?
- Significant contrast: Does the paper clearly position the described make use of respect to literature that is existing? Will it be clear both what’s novel within the extensive research presented and just how it develops on previous work?
- Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for a full-length paper, or wouldn’t it take advantage of further work?
- Overall suggestion: there are lots of good submissions contending for slots at COLING 2018; essential could it be to feature this 1? Will people learn a complete great deal by looking over this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is way better to change from other reviewers rather than grade every thing in the centre.